EU Pauses Anti-Greenwashing Law: What It Means for Sustainable Communications.

In a surprising move, the European Commission has announced it will withdraw the proposed Green Claims Directive, halting negotiations that would have required companies across the EU to substantiate environmental claims — like “climate neutral” or “recycled content” — with independent evidence.

Why the Law Mattered

• A 2020 Commission study found that over half of environmental claims were vague or unsubstantiated.
• The Directive aimed to tackle this by mandating independent verification and penalties for false, vague, or misleading claims.

This would have aligned with reforms passed by the European Parliament earlier this year, requiring environmental claims to be based on scientific evidence, third-party certification, and clear labelling.

Why the Rollback Happened

• The European Commission cited an overwhelming administrative burden on micro businesses if they were included in the law.
• Some lawmakers, particularly from conservative groups, argued the Directive was overly complex and costly, threatening to block the legislation unless it was withdrawn.

The Consequences

• Without the Directive, companies won’t face mandatory pre-approved verification or legal penalties for misleading environmental claims, potentially weakening enforcement.
• Trust in sustainability claims may erode further, making it harder for genuinely responsible businesses to stand out.
• Responsibility for claim-checking and accountability now falls heavily on markets, NGOs, independent watchdogs, and movements like The Anti-Greenwash Charter.

What Comes Next

• The European Commission may still pursue other consumer protection measures to address greenwashing, such as restrictions on vague offset-based claims.

• Meanwhile, credible sustainability communications have never been more important. Businesses should proactively:
  ✅ Adopt independent third-party verification
  ✅ Publish clear, specific sustainability claims
  ✅ Engage with initiatives like The Anti-Greenwash Charter to demonstrate transparency and integrity

The Bottom Line

This pause highlights how fragile regulatory progress on greenwashing can be — even in markets like the EU. Without legal enforcement, brands that care about credibility need to lead by example.

As Charlie, CEO of The Anti-Greenwash Charter, puts it:

“Regulatory setbacks only make market integrity more vital. The difference between vague claims and verified truth becomes the difference between trust and mistrust.”

For brands serious about sustainability, the message is clear: self-regulation, independent verification, and honest communications aren’t optional — they’re the foundation for long-term trust.

For a Truly Sustainable Future

If your organisation believes in doing the right thing — and telling the truth about it — we’d love to have you with us.

📢 Join us as we take this next step.
Become a signatory, shape the future, and show the world what responsible sustainability communications really look like.

Join the Charter →