Engineering Trust in Sustainability Communications

Engineering Trust in Sustainability Communications.

Three Anti-Greenwash Charter signatories show how engineers and industry leaders are strengthening trust in sustainability claims across the built environment.

Date: March 2026
Read time: 3 mins
Author: AGC

In the built environment, sustainability is becoming increasingly technical.

Engineers calculate embodied carbon. Designers model energy performance. Materials are assessed against detailed environmental standards. The decisions made at the design stage can shape a building’s environmental impact for decades.

Yet the language used to describe this work often remains broad.

Terms such as low carbon, net zero and sustainable now appear across the sector. Without clear explanation and evidence, however, these claims can easily become ambiguous. The challenge is not only to improve environmental performance, but to communicate it with precision.

For a growing number of organisations, credible sustainability communication is becoming part of professional discipline.

Three Anti Greenwash Charter signatories illustrate how this shift is taking place across the built environment.

Each operates at a different point in the sector. Yet all have aligned their communications with the Charter’s four core standards of Transparency, Accountability, Fairness and Honesty.

Together, they show how trust in sustainability claims is built through evidence, structure and clear communication.

Perega: Precision Behind Sustainability Claims


For engineering consultancy Perega, sustainability begins with design.

The firm has expanded its work on embodied carbon, reuse and low carbon structural strategies across projects in the UK. As this work developed, so did the need to communicate it carefully.

“We realised how exposed you become when you start talking more about sustainability,” says Emma Neal, Head of Marketing. “Every claim can be questioned.”

The issue was not deliberate greenwashing. Instead, the team saw uncertainty across the sector. Terms such as low carbon can appear simple but often lack clear explanation.

Joining the Anti Greenwash Charter helped introduce stronger internal processes. Perega developed a Green Claims Policy and formalised review procedures to ensure sustainability statements are supported by evidence.

“We are not more cautious because we are scared,” Emma says. “We are more confident because we understand what we are doing.”

In engineering, credibility is fundamental. Clear communication helps reinforce that trust.

Whitby Wood: Structure Around Principles


Whitby Wood operates internationally, helping clients design buildings and urban environments with lower environmental impact.

The consultancy has been strengthening how sustainability is embedded across its operations, supported by UK emissions targets validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.

But communicating that work consistently across a global practice brings its own challenge.

“The inconsistency in how sustainability terms are used makes greenwashing easier,” says Stephanie Cobb, Head of Marketing.

Joining the Charter provided a framework to strengthen communication practices. Whitby Wood introduced a Green Claims Policy, delivered staff training and updated editorial guidance to ensure sustainability claims are clearly defined and supported.

The process has also encouraged internal discussion about how environmental claims are communicated.

“Trust is not something you simply claim,” Stephanie says. “It is something you demonstrate through processes and transparency.”

Timber Development UK: Accountability Across the Industry


While consultancies influence individual projects, Timber Development UK operates at the sector level.

The organisation represents the UK timber supply chain, from sawmills and manufacturers to architects and contractors. Its work promotes responsible sourcing, certification schemes and best practice in timber construction.

As environmental claims have increased across the construction sector, so has the need for credible information.

“We wanted to ensure any claims we made were backed by robust data and a structured process,” says Charlie Law, Sustainability Director.

Joining the Anti Greenwash Charter helped formalise that approach. Timber Development UK strengthened internal review procedures and introduced training to ensure sustainability claims are properly verified before publication.

“Being part of the Charter gives our team greater confidence in what we say,” Charlie explains.

 

A Professional Standard


These organisations differ in scale and role. One designs structures. Another advises on engineering globally. The third represents an entire supply chain.

What connects them is a shared recognition that sustainability communication now requires the same discipline as sustainability itself.

In the built environment, environmental claims influence design decisions, procurement choices and public understanding. When those claims are precise and evidence based, they support trust across the sector.

For a growing number of organisations, that trust is something that must be engineered as carefully as the buildings themselves.

Sustainability Communications with Confidence


If your organisation wants to protect its reputation, reduce greenwashing risk, and communicate sustainability with confidence, we’d love you to join us.

📢 Become a signatory of The Anti-Greenwash Charter.
Shape the future of responsible communication and show stakeholders what honest, trusted sustainability leadership looks like.

Join the Charter →

A New Era for Sustainability Claims in the Built Environment

A New Era for Sustainability Claims in the Built Environment.

In the built environment, sustainability progress depends not only on how materials perform, but on how clearly and honestly they are described. This article highlights how some of our signatories are building trust in the materials sector by aligning their communications with the Charter’s standards.

Date: February 2026
Read time: 5 mins
Author: AGC

The built environment has significant environmental impact. From the extraction of raw materials to how buildings perform in use and how products are disposed of at the end of their life, today’s choices will influence carbon emissions, resource use and human health for decades.

Construction materials have become more advanced and more technical. However, the way their sustainability credentials are communicated has not always evolved at the same pace.

In the construction materials sector, environmental claims are often reduced to simple labels such as eco, natural, low impact or green. These words may suggest good intentions, but without clear explanation and supporting evidence they can create confusion.

Architects, contractors, specifiers and consumers rely on accurate information. Trust depends not only on product performance, but on the verifiability of the claims being made.

Responsible sustainability communication is therefore central to professional integrity and progress in the built environment.

This is why we’re delighted a growing group of Anti Greenwash Charter signatories in the sector are showing how higher standards of communication practice can be set.

Among them are:

Each operates in a different part of the market, and yet all share a commitment to the Charter’s four core standards: Transparency, Accountability, Fairness and Honesty.

Back to Earth


Back to Earth sells sustainable building materials, particularly insulation for retrofit projects. The company is known for the quality of it’s advice, combining technical knowledge with practical construction experience. It sources selected products from across Europe, with attention to environmental performance and functional quality.

For founder Chris Brookman, sustainability has always been essential. However, it is not enough on its own.

“The functionality of many of these natural materials is what really sets them apart, and it just so happens that they are sustainable too.”

After years of seeing unclear or exaggerated claims related to materials, Chris wanted a clearer distinction between promotional language and measurable performance. Signing the Charter was a public commitment to that principle.

Through the Charter process, Back to Earth:

  • Refined its marketing language to remove ambiguity

  • Formalised evidence based claims using Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs)

  • Strengthened internal review processes through a Green Claims Policy

“It is easy to be vague in marketing. The Charter helped us remove that. Everything we say is backed by something solid.”

The results have been clear. The team has greater internal confidence, stronger technical understanding and improved trust from all stakeholders who value clear and specific information.

Edward Bulmer Natural Paint


Edward Bulmer Natural Paint was created to address a lack of transparency in the paint industry. While other interior materials could be traced and certified, paint ingredients were often not fully disclosed.

“We could source FSC timber and understand textiles. But with paint, there was no transparency about ingredients.”

The company was founded on the belief that customers should know exactly what they bring into their homes. It uses traditional materials and ecological formulations, publishes full ingredient lists and prioritises breathable, durable finishes.

In an industry where broad terms such as eco friendly are common, joining the Charter provided independent validation of values the company had long upheld.

As a signatory, the organisation:

  • Developed a formal Green Claims Policy

  • Appointed a sustainability lead to oversee impact and communications

  • Strengthened audit processes by measuring weight, energy use and emissions rather than relying only on cost based metrics

“The Charter challenges you to explain why you believe you meet the standard, and to demonstrate it.”

Internally, this has improved alignment and clarity. Externally, it gives customers confidence that claims are independently reviewed.

Brouns & Co


Brouns & Co produces linseed oil paint as an alternative to petrochemical based products. For founder Michiel Brouns, however, the issue is not only what a product contains. It is also how it is marketed.

“People hear water based and assume it is better. In most cases, it simply means plastic mixed with water. It is not more sustainability and it is not honesty.”

Unlike many manufacturers, Brouns & Co designs products for durability rather than frequent replacement. In this model, longevity reflects quality.

Signing the Charter provided a structured framework for reviewing and strengthening all communications. A comprehensive Green Claims Policy now supports both marketing and technical content.

For Michiel, what sets the Charter apart is its focus on consistency. It does not reward isolated claims or partial transparency. It requires a coherent approach across the business.

“This is not just about marketing. It is about respect, for the customer, for the environment and for the truth.”

 

A Collective Shift in the Materials Sector


The importance of these organisations signing the Charter lies not only in their individual commitments, but in their collective example.

They show that responsible sustainability communication in the built environment sector:

  • Strengthens credibility

  • Supports commercial resilience through trust

  • Brings clarity to a complex marketplace

  • Raises standards across the sector

In the sector, decisions have long term environmental consequences and the integrity of communication matters as much as the integrity of materials.

Sustainability Communications with Confidence


If your organisation wants to protect its reputation, reduce greenwashing risk, and communicate sustainability with confidence, we’d love you to join us.

📢 Become a signatory of The Anti-Greenwash Charter.
Shape the future of responsible communication and show stakeholders what honest, trusted sustainability leadership looks like.

Join the Charter →

Professional Services Firms Are Raising the Standard of Sustainability Communication

Professional Services Firms Inspiring a Higher Standard of Sustainability Communication.

As expectations around sustainability communication rise, professional services firms are leading by example and inspiring their clients to see independent validation and responsible, transparent communication as a mark of leadership and credibility.

Date: February 2026
Read time: 4 mins
Author: AGC

As expectations around sustainability communication rise, professional services firms are leading by example and inspiring their clients to see independent validation and responsible, transparent communication as a mark of leadership and credibility.

Across sectors, organisations are navigating a more complex communications landscape. Regulation is evolving. Stakeholders are more informed. Procurement processes increasingly reference ESG performance and evidence. In this environment, how sustainability commitments are communicated is just as important as the commitments themselves.

Professional services firms sit at the centre of this shift. They advise on positioning, shape messaging, prepare campaigns, and guide reporting.

Their influence extends far beyond their own brands. When they adopt clear standards for Transparency, Accountability, Fairness and Honesty, they elevate expectations across every client they support.

Three Charter signatories demonstrate how this leadership translates into impact.

Embedding Credibility from Day One


For Ltt Group, responsible communication is integral to its business model.

Founded to provide flexible, on-demand sustainability expertise, Ltt Group supports organisations that are building capability but may not yet require a full-time sustainability function. Founder Jonathan Wragg has long emphasised that credibility depends on clarity. Ambitious goals are important, but stakeholders need to understand the journey, the milestones, and the next steps.

By becoming a signatory of The Anti-Greenwash Charter, Ltt Group embedded this philosophy formally within its operations. The Charter’s principles now inform onboarding, internal processes, and plans for transparent impact reporting.

Independent validation strengthens the firm’s ability to advise clients with confidence and demonstrates that its own communications meet the standards it encourages others to adopt.

This approach sends a powerful message to clients: responsible communication is not about limiting ambition, but about presenting progress in a way that builds lasting trust.

Turning Responsible Communication into Competitive Advantage


At Hattrick, responsible sustainability communication is positioned as a strategic asset.

The Manchester-based B2B communications agency, led by Malin Cunningham, works with businesses to articulate complex ideas clearly and credibly. Already operating as a certified B Corp, Hattrick chose to join the Charter to further strengthen its communications framework.

The Charter provides a practical tool that informs internal training, campaign development, and client advisory work.

It supports the team in asking for evidence, refining claims, and ensuring proportionality. Rather than creating friction, this structure has enabled more constructive conversations with clients.

Many clients welcome this clarity. Independent recognition reassures them that their messaging has been tested against a defined standard. It transforms sustainability communication from a reputational risk into an opportunity to demonstrate leadership.

Influencing Standards Across a Sector


For Select First, the impact extends across an entire industry.

Specialising in the flooring and interiors sector, Select First observed a growing number of sustainability claims that lacked sufficient clarity or substantiation. By signing the Charter, the agency formalised its commitment to rigorous, evidence-based communication and developed a clear Green Claims Policy.

The Charter’s framework strengthened internal discipline and reinforced the agency’s confidence in challenging vague messaging.

In doing so, Select First has positioned itself as a trusted advisor, helping clients understand that transparent, accountable communication strengthens brand credibility.

Clients increasingly value this leadership. Being able to demonstrate alignment with an independent standard differentiates both agency and client in competitive markets where trust matters.

 

Leadership Through Independent Validation


What unites these professional services firms is a recognition of influence. Their work shapes how sustainability is communicated across multiple organisations and sectors. When they adopt a clear, independent standard, they inspire clients to do the same.

The Anti-Greenwash Charter complements regulation by providing structured guidance, expert review, and independent recognition. It supports organisations in moving from uncertainty to clarity and from aspiration to accountable communication.

By championing Transparency, Accountability, Fairness and Honesty, agencies and consultancies are showing that responsible communication is not a constraint.

It is a signal of professionalism and leadership.

In doing so, they are not only strengthening their own credibility. They are helping to reshape sustainability communication across industries, creating a culture where independent validation and honest storytelling are recognised as the benchmark for trust.

Sustainability Communications with Confidence


If your organisation wants to protect its reputation, reduce greenwashing risk, and communicate sustainability with confidence, we’d love you to join us.

📢 Become a signatory of The Anti-Greenwash Charter.
Shape the future of responsible communication and show stakeholders what honest, trusted sustainability leadership looks like.

Join the Charter →

The Future of Responsible Communication

The Future of Responsible Communication.

An evening of insight, stories and connection.

Date: February 2026
Read time: 4 mins
Author: TAGC

On a wet January evening in London, something quietly important happened.

On Tuesday 27 January 2026, sustainability, communications and ESG leaders gathered at Swedenborg Hall for The Future of Responsible Communication, an in person event hosted by the Anti Greenwash Charter. The room was full. The conversation was honest. And the question at the heart of the evening was clear.

Who is responsible for responsible communication, and what does accountability really look like in 2026?

 

From uncertainty to clarity


Opening the evening, Charlie Martin, Founder and CEO of the Anti Greenwash Charter, set the scene.

He described the modern communications landscape as something of a “Wild West”. A world where the volume of content has exploded, but shared standards have not kept pace. Digital acceleration, social media and pressure to perform have created conditions where trust in claims, information and communication is at an all time low.

Regulation, Charlie acknowledged, plays a vital role. Frameworks like the UK’s Green Claims Code establish a baseline for what not to do. But they do not define leadership.

Rules show organisations where the floor is. They do not show what good looks like.

That gap between compliance and credibility is where the Charter sits. Not as a regulator, but as an independent standard that helps organisations prove, publicly and consistently, that they are communicating responsibly.

 

Why responsible communication matters


Charlie went on to connect the dots between trust, confidence and progress.

When trust erodes, confidence suffers. Decisions slow down. And when decision making falters, meaningful progress on environmental and social issues slows with it.

In a world grappling with misinformation, polarisation and the rise of “my truth” narratives, responsible communication is no longer a nice to have.

It is a condition for change. It can act as an accelerator rather than a brake on progress.

The Charter’s four core standards, Transparency, Accountability, Fairness and Honesty, provide a shared foundation that organisations can commit to, embed internally and demonstrate externally. This is not about perfection. It is about integrity.

And crucially, it is about confidence. In a landscape where greenhushing is as real a risk as greenwashing, organisations need support to speak clearly, accurately and with assurance.

 

Beyond principles, embedding responsibility in practice


One of the key insights from Charlie’s introduction was that principles alone are not enough.

While the Charter supports organisation wide governance, culture and standards, signatories have been clear about what they need next. They want support at the content level.

This insight led to the development of truMRK, the Charter’s sister initiative, which provides independent verification of individual pieces of communication. By assessing claims, language and context, truMRK helps organisations ensure that what they publish is accurate, substantiated and not misleading by omission.

Together, the Charter and truMRK form a complementary system.

One embeds responsible communication culturally. The other supports it practically, campaign by campaign.

 

Who is responsible for responsible communication?


Following Charlie’s introduction, the evening moved into a panel discussion hosted by Oliver Parry, Senior Adviser to the Anti Greenwash Charter.

He was joined by Alastair McCapra, CEO at the CIPR, Saul Humphrey, Senior Vice President at CIOB, and Lara Sharrock, Director of Sustainability at Emperor.

The discussion explored accountability across roles and disciplines. From leadership teams and sustainability professionals to marketers, agencies and communications specialists. A clear theme emerged.

Responsible communication is a shared responsibility, but it requires clear ownership, strong governance and the confidence to challenge weak or misleading claims.

Credibility is not built through silence or exaggeration. It is built through openness, evidence and consistency over time.

 

A community built on trust


The evening closed, as all good conversations should, with people talking to one another.

Over drinks and informal discussions, signatories, collaborators and new faces continued the debate. They shared challenges, asked questions and found reassurance in the fact that many organisations are navigating the same tensions.

That sense of community is intentional. The Charter is not about calling organisations out. It is about bringing them together.

 

Looking ahead


The Future of Responsible Communication was not about predicting trends. It was about setting direction.

As expectations rise and scrutiny intensifies, organisations that can demonstrate integrity in how they communicate will be the ones that earn trust, reduce risk and lead with confidence.

The Anti Greenwash Charter exists to support that journey.

It provides independent recognition, practical guidance and a shared standard for what responsible communication looks like in practice.

Because the future of sustainability does not just depend on what organisations do. It depends on how honestly, clearly and responsibly they communicate it.

Sustainability Communications with Confidence


If your organisation wants to protect its reputation, reduce greenwashing risk, and communicate sustainability with confidence, we’d love you to join us.

📢 Become a signatory of The Anti-Greenwash Charter.
Shape the future of responsible communication and show stakeholders what honest, trusted sustainability leadership looks like.

Join the Charter →

What Signatory Status Really Means and Why It Builds Trust

What Signatory Status Really Means and Why It Builds Trust.

A closer look at what signatory status represents in practice, how organisations put the Charter’s standards into action, and why it strengthens trust across every stakeholder relationship.

Date: December 2025
Read time: 5 mins
Author: TAGC

Signatory status is a clear signal that an organisation communicates about sustainability in an honest, responsible and transparent way. It shows that claims have been reviewed, supported with evidence, and aligned with recognised standards of good practice.

It is not just a label. Signatory status reflects a genuine commitment to integrity and a willingness to communicate with clarity and accountability.

As Charlie Martin, Founder of The Anti-Greenwash Charter, explains:

“Becoming a signatory isn’t about saying you are perfect. It’s about showing that you welcome scrutiny and that you want to communicate with integrity.”

 

A Commitment to High Standards


Signatory status means an organisation has chosen to adopt the Charter’s four core standards:

  • Transparency: being open about progress, challenges and evidence.

  • Accountability: taking responsibility for the claims it makes.

  • Fairness: presenting information in a balanced and accurate way.

  • Honesty: avoiding exaggeration or misleading language.

These principles guide how an organisation communicates and how it evaluates the sustainability information it shares. The result is not only more credible communication, but also clearer internal processes and greater confidence among teams.

Below are real examples from current signatories and how these standards have shaped their communication.

 

Case Study: Karndean Designflooring


Why they joined

Karndean is a global flooring manufacturer. Sustainability is increasingly central to their strategy, and the business wanted an independent benchmark to ensure that their sustainability messaging is accurate, consistent and evidence-led across all regions.

Karndean explained their decision to join with a simple statement:

“You can trust that claims about Karndean products and operations are fair, accurate and substantiated.”

What changed

  • The business developed a Green Claims Policy to guide every region.

  • Sustainability language on websites and marketing materials was reviewed and strengthened.

  • Teams now follow a shared process for checking and approving claims.

Impact

Customers, retailers, investors and partners can rely on the consistency of Karndean’s claims, no matter the market. For the business, the Charter provides confidence that sustainability communication supports both trust and long-term reputation.

Read Full Case Study

 

Case Study: Edward Bulmer Natural Paint


Why they joined

The natural paint market is crowded with vague terms like “eco friendly” and “non toxic”. Edward Bulmer Natural Paint wanted a clear, evidence-based way to communicate the true environmental profile of its products.

As the company explained:

“We were up against powerful incumbents with big budgets making vague claims. The Charter helped us benchmark our instinct for honesty and transparency.”

What changed

  • The company created a formal Green Claims Policy.

  • Ingredient lists and impact information are published in full.

  • A dedicated sustainability lead was appointed to support evidence collection.

Impact

Customers gain clarity about what the paint is made of and how its impacts are measured. Retailers find it easier to understand the substance behind the brand’s messaging. Internally, the Charter helped embed a stronger culture of rigour and transparency.

Read Full Case Study

 

Case Study: Gunnebo Entrance Control


Why they joined

Gunnebo Entrance Control (GEC) manufactures entrance security systems. Sustainability is not the core product offering, which meant communication sometimes erred on the side of vagueness or silence. The Charter provided a clear framework to communicate environmental impact with confidence.

GEC’s Global Sustainability Officer explained the shift:

“We are a safety-first brand. But that has to include safety for people and for the planet.”

What changed

  • A structured content approval process was introduced.

  • Marketing moved away from generic messaging and towards specific, substantiated information.

Impact

Gunnebo now communicates even more responsibly. Teams feel more confident discussing sustainability publicly, and stakeholders have a clearer view of the company’s real progress.

Read Full Case Study

 

What Signatory Status Means for Stakeholders


The value of signatory status can be seen across all audiences.

Customers

Clearer, more reliable information that supports informed decision making.

Investors and partners

Confidence that sustainability claims are evidence-led and backed by a responsible governance process.

Employees

Reassurance that the organisation’s public commitments are matched by internal intent and action.

Suppliers and contractors

A signal that responsible practice matters throughout the value chain.

Civil society and NGOs

A visible commitment to openness and credible communication.

As Charlie puts it:

“Signatory status gives every audience a reason to trust what they are reading. It closes the gap between intention and perception.”

 

A Visible Mark of Integrity


Each signatory receives a numbered logo. . It represents responsible practice and a willingness to communicate honestly.

As Edward Bulmer notes:

“Our customers can click the Charter logo on our site and know exactly what we stand for.”

The logo helps people understand what an organisation is genuinely doing. It supports a clearer, more trustworthy landscape for sustainability communication.

 

Why Signatory Status Matters


For organisations, becoming a signatory is a conscious choice to build long-term trust with all stakeholders.

For stakeholders, it provides confidence that what they are reading is clear, honest and grounded in evidence.

Across every signatory story, the pattern is the same: responsible communication leads to stronger trust, more confident teams and a more credible voice. In a challenging communications landscape, that clarity has real value.

Sustainability Communications with Confidence


If your organisation wants to protect its reputation, reduce greenwashing risk, and communicate sustainability with confidence, we’d love you to join us.

📢 Become a signatory of The Anti-Greenwash Charter.
Shape the future of responsible communication and show stakeholders what honest, trusted sustainability leadership looks like.

Join the Charter →